Plough Creek
  • Plough Creek Homestead
    • About Us
    • Accommodation >
      • Bookings/enquiries
    • Venue
    • Gallery
  • PCH Blog
  • Plough Creek Cooking School
    • What's on >
      • Bookings/enquiries
    • Gallery
  • Plough Creek Garden
    • Garden events >
      • Bookings/enquiries
    • Plough Creek General Store
    • Gallery
  • Supporters Suppliers & Sponsors
  • Archives
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Talking about yourself ...

26/7/2018

6 Comments

 
Many of you will know that I have been searching for my next employment opportunity – one that will have me leaping out of bed each morning, with anticipation. While I have been searching, I have been so fortunate to have had opportunities come my way to work on some incredible Locum roles, projects and consultancies. Such a variety of experiences. 
 
I continue to apply for roles that inspire me.
 
At an interview a while back, following all the professional and strategic questions that one expects during a job interview, I thought the panel Chair was winding up the process. Instead, they asked to talk about myself and who I was as a person ….. “tell us about the real you that was not presented in your CV”. 
 
After all the personality style evaluations, all the feedback loops, all the professional coaching and mentoring over the years that have told me that I am an extroverted, outgoing, creative, hard-working, practical, accountable (etc.) person, this particular question took me by surprise.
 
I was stumped by it and yes, I faltered with my response.  Firstly, it was asked in a way that was out of context to my usual expectation of an interview. It was not in the usual “professional framework of questions”. Or at least my perception of what that framework is. 
 
Secondly, as I thought the interview was being concluded and the Chair of the panel was about to say “thank you and good bye”, asking such an unexpected question felt  left of centre. On reflection I realized my response was not how I would like to have presented the “real me” story.
 
As time has passed, I have analyzed it over and over in my head and I wondered if it was a skillful maneuver, utilized to determine something about my personality. It was perhaps a strategy that was thought to be able to determine if I was  indeed a suitable person for the role. I will never know. I was not offered the role and yet I knew I met all the selection criteria. 
 
I have now concluded that recruitment and job hunting is a huge iceberg – so much more to who lands the job than what you see/present on the surface.
 
How would you talk about yourself and present a profile in less than one minute, that will leave a lasting and positive impression?

DC
6 Comments
Barbara Glickstein
26/7/2018 11:32:46 pm

This tactic feels like a set-up to me. What? You, the person answering their questions and reflected in your CV isn't the real you? Why wait to the moment of closure to ask you, “tell us about the real you that was not presented in your CV”. Knowing you - you might say, my interests are many - my family, the arts, food, and travel. I am a dedicated and passionate advocate for equality for all beings. I am a dedicated global citizen engaged in the fight for social justice and human rights.
The snarky answer I'd love to think I'd have the courage to say is - How much time do we have so I can measure my response. I am a 21st Century women with vast interests. Interview nonsense pisses me off.

Reply
Kate
27/7/2018 01:13:22 am

Barbara, I like you (and your response) and I haven’t even met you. Deb, it sounds like they were trying to get a sense of what gets you out of bed apart from your professional aspirations. For many people (myself included), my professional and personal interests overlap so my CV would largely be a representation of who I am. It must have been very confusing for you..,

Reply
deb
27/7/2018 09:09:20 am

Oh Kate, one day I hope you do meet Barbara - I just know it would be a fabulous conversation. Like you, I see so much of myself in everything I do as blurred between professional and personal. I actually think it is OK for it all to be intertwined.Thanks for contributing here, I love your perspective.

Deb
27/7/2018 09:05:35 am

Thank You my precious #galpal. I was keen to hear your response. Yes, you do know me well, as I did touch on a number of the interests you mentioned - although I think I 'tripped" over the response, amongst some of the short dialogue I identified as a dog person and she as a cat person. I recall starting with one of my favourite cliches that sums me up about 'health and education being a right not a privilege'. thanks for your response x

Reply
Karen
27/7/2018 05:33:51 am

Hi Deb
This is just the sort of thing I’d do in an interview, ask that type of question. I’ve got 2 major explanations. Firstly when people are polished, got the answers, well prepared, it’s sometimes hard to see “them”. Who are they really without the polish? How will they respond to the unexpected? What are they like in the everyday? We all change under pressure, when emotional, when doing the routine .... so if I’m recruiting for a leadership role, I want to see the “other side” of that person, when they don’t have the polish on perfectly.
My second point is about timing. It came at the end of the interview so I’d suggest that the interviewer was really torn. They had potentially sat through the whole interview trying to hear/see who you really are. They would have to be an introvert, an observer. The timing suggests that they hadn’t formed an opinion and was still grappling.
I think the delayed question is fundamentally about them and the information they need to make decisions, not about you. There could have been many reasons why you weren’t offer the role and potentially none of them had anything to do with that question.
Don’t overthinking it because it has the potential to undermine your confidence.
X

Reply
Deb
27/7/2018 09:20:26 am

My dearest #galpal Karen, your perspective always makes me think about things from another angle. I love reading your response. Having been on the selection panel side of the table so many times, like you I try to sense that which is not obvious and gain a level of insight that may not be in the written word. So I do get that approach. I just had not expected it this time as this interview had initially been defined and described to me how the process would be delivered and I felt VERY prepared for that and in reality it did not proceed that way (demonstrates how literal I was with the instruction and in my preparation). You are right the risk of undermining my confidence is in part, why I wrote about it. In a recent interview I felt so much more agile and I think that was a result of this previous experience. Thank you x

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    PCH Blog

    Featuring the "PCH country cook and gardener"
    Picture
    Una goccia di Toscana...
    Une touché de Provence...
    a taste of Gippsland

    Archives

    December 2021
    September 2021
    January 2021
    December 2019
    January 2019
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.